Article and design
Identify the article of manufacture and the appearance that should define the application.
Product appearance
Cognivito helps evaluate, prepare, and prosecute U.S. design patent applications for the ornamental design of an article of manufacture.
Written and reviewed by Stewart Myers, Oregon attorney and registered patent attorney · Last reviewed
Direct answer
Short answer: a design patent can protect a new, original, and ornamental design for an article of manufacture. The drawings are central because they show the claimed design; choices about solid and broken lines, views, surface treatment, and claimed portions affect what the application presents.
Design protection is different from utility protection. A product may justify one, the other, both, or neither. The strategy should consider the appearance customers recognize, likely variants, competitor design-arounds, launch timing, and whether related trademark or copyright questions also exist.
Drawing-led strategy
Identify the article of manufacture and the appearance that should define the application.
Coordinate line treatment and views so the drawings consistently communicate what is and is not claimed.
Consider whether meaningful versions require separate figures, embodiments, applications, or a coordinated filing family.
Map product announcements, sales, crowdfunding, trade shows, catalogs, and other disclosures before filing.
Frequently asked
No. Utility patents address qualifying functional inventions; design patents address ornamental appearance. A single product may contain both functional and ornamental innovations.
USPTO rules and practice permit different forms of visual disclosure in appropriate circumstances, but consistency, clarity, surface treatment, and claim interpretation require care. The selected format should be evaluated before filing.
Potentially. The drawings can distinguish claimed and unclaimed portions under applicable practice. Whether a partial design is appropriate depends on the article, novelty, commercial target, and drawing strategy.
A search may help evaluate prior designs and filing strategy, but no search is exhaustive and the relevant comparison is visual and fact-specific. Search scope should match the decision being made.
Authoritative sources
The drawings and application record must be evaluated as filed. General website examples do not determine the scope or validity of any design claim.
Start with a nonconfidential product description and the earliest known disclosure or sale date.
Discuss a Design Filing