Inventorship and ownership
Identify natural-person contributions to the claimed subject matter and document the chain from inventors to the intended owner.
Functional inventions
Cognivito prepares and prosecutes U.S. utility patent applications with attention to disclosure quality, claim scope, prior art, alternatives, ownership, and the commercial job of the patent.
Written and reviewed by Stewart Myers, Oregon attorney and registered patent attorney ยท Last reviewed
Direct answer
Short answer: under the categories summarized by the USPTO, utility patents may cover qualifying new and useful processes, machines, articles of manufacture, compositions of matter, and improvements. The enforceable boundary is defined by issued claims, not by the product name or abstract alone.
A strong application must both teach the invention and support claims at useful levels of scope. It should address the implementation the inventor prefers, viable alternatives, the features that distinguish prior approaches, and the combinations competitors may adopt.
Application components
Identify natural-person contributions to the claimed subject matter and document the chain from inventors to the intended owner.
Explain the invention, operation, embodiments, alternatives, and practical context with the detail the filing strategy requires.
Use figures to support structures, relationships, sequences, interfaces, and other features that the written disclosure and claims rely on.
Define requested legal scope through independent and dependent claims while preserving options for examination and continuing practice.
Frequently asked
The application proceeds through USPTO processing and, in most cases, substantive examination. An examiner may issue office actions addressing prior art or other requirements. The applicant may respond with argument, amendment, evidence, an interview, or another available procedural step.
Yes, within legal and procedural limits. Amendments must remain supported by the filed disclosure and are evaluated against the cited art and other patentability requirements. A narrower allowance is not automatically a good business result; value depends on what the claims cover.
A continuation or other continuing application may pursue additional claims based on an earlier disclosure when statutory and procedural requirements are met. Whether to continue depends on support, timing, portfolio goals, cost, competitors, product changes, and pending claim scope.
No. Patentability and freedom to operate are different analyses. A product can embody a patentable improvement while still implicating another party's broader patent.
Authoritative sources
Application requirements and deadlines are fact-specific and can change. Current USPTO rules, notices, forms, fee schedules, and the actual file record control.
Start with a nonconfidential description, the development stage, and any known disclosure or filing history.
Discuss a Utility Application