Company profile
- U.S. technology company
- Generally 5 to 100 employees, with likely strongest fit around 10 to 50
- At least one Phase II SBIR/STTR or comparable federal R&D award
- At least one invention or active patent family
Cognivito practice line
Federal funding adds another layer to ordinary invention and patent management. Cognivito helps small technology companies connect the award file, invention record, patent family, reporting record, ownership documents, and commercialization decisions through one coordinated process.
The operating gap
Technical staff know what was built. Grant personnel know the award. Patent counsel knows the patent family. Management knows the business objective. Yet no one may own the complete relationship among those records.
Public information alone does not establish that a company has a reporting or legal problem. The work begins with the actual award, current records, responsible people, and source-linked questions.
Who the service is for
Common triggers
What Cognivito coordinates
Patent-family review includes government-support statements where potentially applicable. Commercialization review can include licensing, financing, Phase III, transaction, and utilization information within the written scope.
Initial paid product
The Review organizes the included records, identifies supported findings and unresolved questions, and delivers a risk-ranked action plan and twelve-month calendar.
See the fixed pilot scopeWhen AI participates in R&D
A specialized module can examine how human technical contributions, AI outputs, inventorship, ownership, federal funding, evidence, and protection strategy fit together. AI involvement does not automatically create a defect.
Explore the moduleWhen the job continues
Recurring service is available only when the company has a continuing job. It is defined-capacity counsel, not unlimited outside counsel, and major matters remain separately scoped.
See the cadence and boundariesWorks with existing professionals
Cognivito does not need to replace patent counsel, grant consultants, accountants, or other trusted advisers who are already doing their work well. The role is to identify where responsibility is fragmented, coordinate the federal-invention and IP layer, and define who owns each next action.
Frequently asked questions
No. It is a Cognivito legal-practice description. It is not a government office, government program, certification, government-approved provider, or recognized legal specialty.
No. Contractor ownership, conception or first actual reduction to practice, funded work, the actual award, incorporated clauses, and the facts must be analyzed.
No. iEdison is one reporting system. The work connects award terms, technical chronology, inventions, patent families, ownership, reporting, and commercialization. Portal entry without legal and factual analysis is not the core service.
No. Cognivito can work with existing patent counsel and other advisers, define responsibilities, and coordinate the federal-invention and IP layer.
The pilot covers defined numbers of awards, inventions or candidate inventions, patent families, interviews, related iEdison records, selected ownership records, a source-linked findings report, action plan, twelve-month calendar, and presentation meeting.
Missing evidence may produce unresolved questions rather than definitive conclusions. Expanded historical reconstruction or remediation requires a separate written scope.
No. It is not a compliance certification and does not guarantee title, patent rights, agency acceptance, funding, commercialization, or any external result.
Potentially, when the work is within verified competence, coverage, authorization, and jurisdiction and is separately engaged. Patent strategy, drafting, prosecution, ownership, and other expansion work are not included automatically.
No. Scope, record limits, cadence, response expectations, client responsibilities, payment terms, and separately priced work are defined in the engagement.
The same inventorship and conception principles apply. Cognivito can examine claims, chronology, human contributions, AI activity, ownership, evidence, and federal funding without assuming that AI use created a defect.
Next step
The fit call is not a free legal review. Do not send confidential or time-sensitive information.